The Trauma Pro

article thumbnail

Undertriage And Overtriage: The Cribari Grid

The Trauma Pro

Any trauma performance improvement professional understands the importance of undertriage and overtriage. Overtriage occurs when a patient who does not meet trauma activation criteria gets one anyway. And undertriage is the converse, where no activation is called despite criteria being met. As you may expect, the latter is much more dangerous for the patient.

article thumbnail

Preperitoneal Packing Vs Angioembolization: Part 3

The Trauma Pro

In the previous post in this series, I described an early review article summarizing several older studies comparing these two hemorrhage control techniques for pelvic fractures. Today, I’ll review another paper fresh off the press, published just this month. This paper comes from the orthopedics and neurosurgical groups at the University of Texas-San Antonio.

Fractures 147
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Preperitoneal Packing Vs Angioembolization: Part 2

The Trauma Pro

In my last post, I reviewed an early paper on preperitoneal packing (PPP). Today, I’ll look at an earlier review article summarizing some smaller studies comparing it to angioembolization. In the next post, I’ll look at a brand new paper that includes a cost analysis as well. Interestingly, the use of AE and PPP vary geographically. Angioembolization has been a mainstay in the US for some time, and PPP has been more commonly used in Europe.

Radiology 147
article thumbnail

Preperitoneal Packing Vs Angioembolization: Part 1

The Trauma Pro

In this series, I will review the two major techniques for addressing troublesome bleeding from pelvic fractures. This post will review the evolution of packing techniques and more fully describe the concept of preperitoneal packing. Next, I’ll review an early paper that compared the snippets of information we had to angioembolization. In the last post in the series, I’ll discuss a paper in press that compares the efficacy and hospital charges of the two techniques.

Fractures 147
article thumbnail

The Evolution Of Penetrating Neck Trauma Management – Part 3: Determining Risk

The Trauma Pro

In the last post, I described the first crucial step in the contemporary management of penetrating neck trauma, control of obvious external hemorrhage. Let’s move on to the nuts and bolts of figuring out what needs to be done about the injury. Now, it’s time to triage your patient based on clinical signs that predict the presence or absence of a significant injury.

article thumbnail

The Evolution Of Penetrating Neck Trauma Management – Part 2: Initial Steps

The Trauma Pro

In my previous post, I described the early days of penetrating neck injury management and introduced a paper suggesting that this concept should be revised. Today, I will summarize a paper by Siletz and Inaba that is currently in press and outlines what the contemporary way of treating these injuries should be. Step 1. If present, rapidly control external hemorrhage and airway compromise.

article thumbnail

The Evolution Of Penetrating Neck Trauma Management – Part 1

The Trauma Pro

“When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do, sir?” This is a famous quote from John Maynard Keynes. (Or is it? There is some debate over its authenticity, but you get the idea it tries to convey.) Our knowledge base continually changes, so we must be willing to change our minds (and practices) based on new, reliable information.